Building Credibility Through Institutional Strengthening
Uganda National NGO Forum together with DENIVA, in collaboration with Care International Uganda convened stakeholders in Uganda’s civil sector gathered to discuss the evolving landscape of localization, self-regulation, and institutional strengthening. Dr. Moses Isooba emphasized the critical need for civil society actors to be “fit for purpose” as the shift towards locally-led development gains momentum.
The Evolution of Localization and Self-Regulation
Between 2006 and 2025, the NGO Quality Assurance Certification Mechanism (QuAM), a self-regulatory tool developed by and for NGOs in Uganda for localization underwent various transformations, adapting to emerging challenges and policy shifts. By 2023, it became evident that mechanism and recognition were in decline. A rapid assessment was conducted to evaluate the state of the mechanism and recalibrate its objectives.
Localization is not merely about transitioning responsibilities from international NGOs (INGOs) to national actors, it is about ensuring that these organizations have the financial independence, leadership capacity, and governance structures to sustain their work. INGOs, rather than simply transferring funds, are facilitating a shift that demands national organizations prove their institutional health and accountability.
Dr. Isooba underscored that compliance and quality assurance mechanisms are not optional—they are essential for organizational legitimacy. In an environment where regulatory scrutiny is increasing, civil society actors must align their operations with legal frameworks while maintaining their core values and mission. Procedural legitimacy—adhering to state regulations—must be complemented by operational excellence and self-regulation.
This convening provided a platform for civil society organizations (CSOs) to reflect on their internal governance structures. A key takeaway was that compliance is a safeguard that enables organizations to navigate complex political and regulatory landscapes. As Dr. Isooba stated, “Even when we disagree with certain policies, staying compliant is our best defense. It protects our operational space and credibility.”
Adapting to a Changing Funding Landscape
With a $60 billion global rollback in overseas aid, civil society actors are rethinking survival strategies. Dr. Isooba highlighted the need for civil society organizations to reposition themselves as viable partners for donors and multilateral institutions. This means conducting internal assessments, improving governance, and demonstrating transparency.
The convening also addressed the responsibilities of INGOs in this transition. They face three choices: transformation, dissolution, or adaptation. Many, like CARE International Uganda, have chosen to transform—empowering national actors while maintaining a supportive role. This approach ensures that local organizations not only receive funding but also build the capacity to sustain their initiatives independently.
Enhancing the National Quality Assurance Mechanism (QuAM)
One of the session’s focal points was the National QuAM Council’s role in strengthening governance within the sector. A structured approach has been established with co-sponsors and a dedicated secretariat to oversee implementation. At the regional level, committees have been set up to ensure effective governance in Western Uganda, Eastern Uganda, and beyond.
Dr. Isooba urged CSOs to actively engage with these mechanisms and use them to self-regulate. “We must stop relying solely on INGOs for validation. We have the tools and expertise to hold ourselves accountable. Let’s own the process and define the standards for our sector.”
A Call to Action
The convening concluded with a call to all development actors to embrace localization as more than just a policy shift—it is a movement towards self-reliance. The focus now is on strengthening governance, securing sustainable funding, and ensuring that national organizations are fully equipped to lead development efforts in Uganda.
As discussions continue, stakeholders will work towards refining quality assurance mechanisms, enhancing institutional health, and building a resilient sector that can thrive in the face of funding uncertainties. The localization agenda is not just about taking on responsibility—it is about proving readiness and leading with confidence.
